44. It was rather abruptly that the
earliest past forms Asa Asus and Aha Ahus were analysed as a-as-a a-as-us and a-ah-a
a-ah-us, and then two unforeseen verbs as (to be) and ah (to say) emerged. Then the
bisyllabic verbs, e.g., cara began to be reduplicated through the first syllable :
ca-cara. This was the beginning of the perfect formation in Vedic.
44a. The agglutinative verbal form A-sa (it was, there
was) itself later lost the final a due to accent, and As (RV 10,129,3b) was there at a
very late stage. When the persons began to be distinguished, As- was extended by -am for
the 1p. but by -s- and -t- with the interposed -I- for the 2p and the 3p. respectively.
Thus three separate forms emerged:
3. As-I-t
2. As-I-s
1. As-am
A similar exercise
was carried out for the plural:
3. As-an
2. As-ta
1. As-ma
We know how these
forms were explained by Panini: he took A- as the past augment, as the strong base in sg.,
and s as the weak base elsewhere; and then he added the endings:
| 3. A-as-I-t |
A-s-an |
| 2. A-as-I-s |
A-s-ta |
| 1. A-as-am |
A-s-ma |
45. The past participle with -Tha at the
agglutinative stage of Indus is attested. But there was another such affix, namely -ma,
added specifically to the verb Sa (to be), making Sa-ma (be-past), which appears as the
contracted past postposition sma after the present forms in Sanskrit. Thus gacchati sma =
he goes-past (he went, used to go). It is presumed that this past participle expressed a
habitual action. It could not, however, be popular in the language.
a. Corresponding to the past affix -ma at the
agglutinative stage and contracted with the verb ºa (to be) as s-ma at the inflexional
Vedic stage, coming down to Sanskrit, there were two more affixes at the agglutinative
stage, remaining unnoticed till now.
(i) The affix ha made perfect tense, as even now in
some rustic dialects of Hindi, but it was fossilised with the verb sa (to continue) as the
particle saha (with), lit. has continued, in Sanskrit.
One more Indus
perfect form appearing as suffix in Sanskrit is maha: ma-ha (time-perfect = hs grown
old) appears after pitA and mAtA, pitA-maha (grandfather) mAtA-maha (grandmother),
literally father (and) mother grown old.
(ii) The affix ra made pluperfect tense, as even now
in some rustic dialects in Hindi, but it was fossilised with the verb ca (to take place)
as the secondary suffix -cara (had taken place). It was noted by Panini (5,3,53) as having
bhUta-pUrva sense.
Besides cara
appearing as the secondary suffix, other pluperfect forms, e.g. mAra cupid), dAra (wife),
jAra (parampur), etc. have appeared as nouns.
b. Needless to say, it has been repeated so often,
the future affix gha of the early agglutinative stage, appearing more often as ghA at the
Vedic stage, remained dormant for a long time till it appeared in Hindi as the future gA
affix in the same condition (jA-e-gA he will go from jA-e he should
go from jA to go).
The Middle Voice
46. At least from the statement of Panini (P.
3,4,79-81) it appears that the middle endings came later through the e-bending in the
original affixes. It is also clear from the fact that the older verbs do not have the
middle forms. The middle forms should have come after the emergence of the present forms.
Therefore, there are 3. -te 2. -se 1. -e corresponding to 3. -ti 2. -si 1. -mi. Just like
the 1p.sg. -e (for the expected *me), there is some anomaly in pl., except in the 3p.
(-nte). The 2p. pl. is the unexpected -dhve. The 1p. pl. -mahe derives from -masi when a
corresponding -mahi had developed in the past tense.
a. The middle endings for the past tense show
innovation only in the 2p., -thAs in sg. and -dhvam in pl. The 3p. -ta in sg. and -nta in
pl. represent the original past endings for the 3p. The 1p. -i sg. and -mahi pl. are the
expected endings.
b. If we try to imagine the corresponding Indus
affixes at the agglutinative stage, we find that the middle
endings were not contemplated in the past tense. They were the same in active and middle.
Then -thAs and dhvam of the 2p are almost the Vedic development. The -i and -mahi of the
first person are the result of the weakening of -e and -mahe due to accent on the first
syllable (á). Therefore, they may have originated even at the inflexional Indus stage.
47. Thus the Indus middle endings for the present and
past tenses may be the following:
| Present |
Past |
| 3. -te -nte |
-ta
-nta |
| 2. -se - - - |
|
|
1. -e -mahe |
-i
-mahi |
Because the present
endings have emerged after the emergence of the past endings, the latter are, more or
less, original. That is why, they also serve for the middle forms with certain additions
and alterations.
48. The past endings serve for the optative with a
prefixed I. In 3p. pl., an -r- element intervenes, which is actually a phonetic
transformation of -n-, as in other cases (cf. s'arvan : s'aravar-I). In 1p. sg. -i is
extended by a, inviting an intermediate -y-, making -Iya. The whole set is as under:
| 3. -I-ta |
-I-r-an |
| 2. -I-thAs |
-I-dhvam |
| 1. -I-y-a |
-I-mahi |
49. Panini derives the imperative endings by -Am
bending of the e of the present. Whether it goes to the inflexional Indus is very
doubtful. The 2p. sg. -sva is an innovation:
| 3. -tAm |
-ntAm |
| 2. -sva |
-dhvam |
50. The subjunctive middle endings of the Vedic are
just the partial strengthening of the present endings and have the distinctive a- at their
beginning:
| 3. -a-te/tai |
-a-ntai |
| 2. -a-se/sai |
-a-dhvai |
| 1. -ai |
-A-mahai |
Hardly few of these
Vedic endings can be taken back even to the inflexional Indus. They are the Vedic
developments.
Duals
51. The dual forms should have started with
declension and spread over to conjugation, initially with the subject in the third person.
Let us run over the
Vedic dual endings.
| Active |
Middle |
| Present |
Past |
Present |
Past |
| 3. -tas |
-tAm |
-te |
-tAm |
| 2.
-thas |
-tam |
-the |
-thAm |
| 1. -vas |
-va |
-vahe |
-vahi |
a. The modal endings are not different from the
past.
b. It appears that the dual endings are the
arbitrary creations at the Vedic stage, though they must have germinated at the
inflexional Indus stage.
c. When 3p. -tas was conceived, a -thas was
conceived for the 2p. Similarly, 3p. -te was distinguished by 2p. -the in the middle. In
the past tense, 3p. -tam is distinguished by 2p. -tam in active, and 3p. tAm by 2p. -thAm
in middle.
i. Roughly, -t- is for the third person, and th- for
the second person, the past active and middle distinguished by the absence or presence of
i/Ù at the beginning.
d. In the first person, -v- is a distinctive dual
sound, contrasting with the sg. and pl. -m-.
The Vedic Verbs
After the verb tan
(to expand) was deduced from the vocable tánas (offspring) and even after tánas itself
was further reduced to tars (to be thirsty), the monosyllabic verbs ending with consonants
had begun to emerge, already at the inflexional stage of Indus.
We have also seen
that, already at the agglutinative stage of Indus, a monosyllabic verb (e.g. ga, ra, etc.)
had begun to be extended by the semivowels and nasals as well as, less often, by other
syllables:
| ga |
gama |
gacha |
| ra |
rama |
racha |
| pra |
pracha |
|
The following are
based exclusively on the Vedic examples:
| bha |
bhava |
| ha |
hava |
| ja |
jaya |
| ka |
kara |
These are the
monosyllabic verbs with a. It may be supposed that the monosyllabic verbs with vowels
other than a were also extended by stops and sibilants:
| tu |
tuda |
| di |
diva |
| bu |
budha |
| bhU |
bhUSa |
| na |
nas'a |
It has been said
that, at the inflexional stage, when-ti-si -mi were added to distinguish persons and when
-cha-bore the accent, the preceding ra was reduced to R: pracha > pRchá-ti, racha >
Rchá-ti. When -nó- was added to kra, the reduced form of kara, it was further reduced to
kR: kR-Nó-ti.
When the bisyllabic
verbs diva, budha, etc. were further extended by ya, the preceding a was lost: budha-ya
> budh-ya-ti.
When the final a of
the extended verbs, itself considered as infix between the verb and the personal endings,
the remaining parts contracted and reduced to hu,ji,hR, etc.
It was thus that the
Vedic verbal forms were systematised as having the present, perfect and aorist bases with
the present and past tenses as well as the subjunctive, imperative and optative moods.
Later a future tense with the corresponding past and a precative mood developed from the
aorist. The past forms without the augment were reckoned as the injunctive mood.
|